Brangelina: Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt Gossip

Posted in Brad and Angelina, Knox and Vivienne | 21 Comments

21 Responses to “Definitely Pregnant”

1. on 03 Jan 2006 at 3:34 am1Robin

   She’d be adorable pregnant.

2. on 03 Jan 2006 at 4:54 am2abby

   is there solid evidence that she’s pregnant? not that it wouldn’t be good but it feels like we’re just expeculating (sorry 4 my writting, i’m latin), but otherwise good for them!

3. on 03 Jan 2006 at 5:09 am3marga

   Hallelujah! I can hardly wait for those pix.

4. on 03 Jan 2006 at 9:47 am4Emma

   That is so great! Yay for Brad! This is what he wanted when he left Jennifer! I saw that she wants a baby now, but Vince doesn’t. That’s a shame. Anyway, I love that Brangelina is preggers! They are a perfect family now and will be even better with a baby from the Hottest Man on the Planet and the Hottest Woman on the Planet (or what were the titles People mag gave them?)!

5. on 03 Jan 2006 at 12:49 pm5Bella

   At least Angelina does not have a maternity chip that’s missing. AJ’s gonna be the hottest pregnant woman on the face of the earth! Angelicious Mummy…

6. on 04 Jan 2006 at 1:16 am6sunlike

   Come on Cindy G! We´re waiting for an announcement here and not just a mere “Iwill not comment on my client´s private life” whatever…. we´re not buying this anymore, you know?

   I´m so happy for them! They make a wonderful family: Brad, Angie, Mad, Z and the baby that´s due in May or June! *winks*

7. on 04 Jan 2006 at 8:39 am7Maeve

   I was watching Extra tonight and they were emphatic that they are not getting married anytime soon and that Angelina Jolie is not pregnant, she does not want a baby so soon after adopting Zahara. Sorry to be a buzz kill.

   Brangelina, say it isn’t so!!

   Extra! also said Brad’s folks had been in California over the holidays to “get to know Angelina better.” True?

8. on 04 Jan 2006 at 10:05 am8Michelle

   Yeah, I saw Extra too and the lady from US magazine showed the cover of their next issue which blared “THE WEDDING IS OFF” followed by the comments that Maeve spoke of about Angelina NOT being pregnant. So, is this more cat and mouse from Brangelina or is she really not pregnant? I guess only time will tell. Personally, I’m not convinced that she’s pregnant.

9. on 04 Jan 2006 at 9:21 pm9sunlike

   Oh, please US Weekly? Come on guys: last week they were claiming the wedding was on and she was pregnant now Extra is basing their scoop on a supposed Angelina exclusive interview given to whom (let me die of laugh here) US weekly! Yeah, sure!

   She´s pregnant alright. They are just trying Brangelina to come up to the surface and make the announcement with all this hype they are creating around them. What best strategy than boosting contradictory “exclusives”?

   Just IMO anyway!

10. on 04 Jan 2006 at 11:11 pm10Robin

    I never believe anything until I see it with my own eyes but I’d sure like to see her pg. At the same time I like her being an adoptive parent…it sets her out from all the other mommies and I really respect her for it.

11. on 05 Jan 2006 at 1:53 am11Angelina

    Did anyone read the article on MSN about the Brangelina baby?
    http://movies.msn.com/movies/hotgossip?GT1=7538

12. on 05 Jan 2006 at 3:03 am12Maeve

    Yeah, I saw that! Maybe it is true, that would be so nice.

    Is it just me or does the Jennifer Aniston, Vince Vaughn thing seem really wierd?

13. on 05 Jan 2006 at 3:27 am13sunlike

    Thank you for the heads up about the MSN brangelina.

    I´m not saying that she won´t be adopting again, of course she and Brad will be adopting again! That´s one of the many things that makes me admire them immensely. But why wouldn´t she have the right to also have her own flesh and blood child? Is that ilegitime when you set yourself into an adoption route? I don´t think so. I´m sorry but I don´t think both parenting resources are incompatible.

14. on 05 Jan 2006 at 3:40 am14marga

    I read the MSN article, but, like Robin, “I’ll believe it when I hear their announcement, or when I see the “big belly’.” I suggest we all keep our fingers crossed. Uh oh! I stand corrected, “Those of us who are Brangelina lovers,…

15. on 05 Jan 2006 at 3:49 am15sunlike

    I beliee we are seeing a big belly already! At least I am. I´m looking to a bunch of pics of her and I see a bulge. To me she is. See the People mag pics of Angie picking Mad at school yesterday and you see what I mean.

    As for the announcement, I´m expecting one real soon, yes. And I´m croosing my fingers as well as a Brangelina lover I am.

16. on 05 Jan 2006 at 5:18 am16Maeve

    where are the pictures, sunlike?

17. on 05 Jan 2006 at 6:11 am17sunlike

    Maeve:

    http://people.aol.com/people/galleries/0,19884,1145461_4,00.html

    For more pics and the evidence I spoke about see link:

    http://news.eastnews.info/indexn.php?clean=yes&dzial=JOLIE_ANGELINA4&co=wszystkie

18. on 05 Jan 2006 at 6:13 am18sunlike

    Just one question because I´m curious: wham I seeing that my cooment is awaiting moderation?

    Is there any problem?

19. on 05 Jan 2006 at 6:21 am19Michelle

    I know US Weekly isn’t the gospel but neither are any of the sources that claim she is pregnant. Those pictures don’t necessarily prove she’s pregnant, imo. I saw pictures of her before with a little bulge in the belly department and a month or so later the bulge was gone. The pictures could be doctored. Of course she could be pregnant and if she is, I’m happy for them. All I’m saying is, like some others here, until I get an official announcement or her belly is so big that it’s obvious to all that she’s pregnant and not just possible bloating, then I hold out on saying she’s definitely pregnant.

20. on 05 Jan 2006 at 10:54 am20Bella

    AJ ‘s not sperminated? I’m devastated.

21. on 13 Jan 2006 at 12:19 pm21Bella

    AJ ‘s definitely sperminated. I’m exhilarated!